DISQUS

Hello! Homo-Adminus Blog is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

blog.kovyrin.net Jump to website »

Subscribe
- New Comments
Community
Top Commenters
- Scoundrel
  9 comments · 1 points
- dkubb
  3 comments · 1 points
- for you health
  3 comments · 1 points
- Johny
  2 comments · 2 points
- kuru
  2 comments · 1 points
Popular Threads
Recent Comments
- nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-) keep it up
  5 months ago by for you health
  
  in Lighttpd Book from Packt - Great Thanksgiving Present
- nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-) keep it up
  5 months ago by for you health
  
  in Dog-pile Effect and How to Avoid it with Ruby on Rails memcache-client Patch
- nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-) keep it up
  5 months ago by for you health
  
  in ActiveMQ + Ruby Stomp Client: How to process elements one by one
- Top post. Thank you very much. :-)
  5 months ago by jamie
  
  in ActiveMQ Tips: Flow Control and Stalled Producers Problem
- Thanks for the info. May God have mercy on us all.
  5 months ago by Bulimia
  
  in Using Sphinx for Non-Fulltext Queries

Homo-Adminus Blog

Jump to original thread »

ActiveMQ + Ruby Stomp Client: How to process elements one by one

Started by Scoundrel · 8 months ago

Few months ago I’ve switched one of our internal projects from doing synchronous database saves of analytics data to an asynchronous processing using starling + a pool of workers. This was the day when I really understood the power of specialized queue servers. I was using database ( ... Continue reading »

4 comments

W. Andrew Loe III
8 months ago

http://code.google.com/p/activemessaging/

reply

Scoundrel
8 months ago

Yes, I've seen this framework, but unfortunately I wasn't able to get control over ack messages in my tests - it just acknowledges all the messages automatically :-(

reply

Andrew
6 months ago

in active messaging, the default is auto ack, but you can set the header (same as you are doing in your subscribe) to :client when you subscribe to the queue - so there is not a big difference.

reply

for you health
5 months ago

nice article! nice site. you're in my rss feed now ;-)
keep it up

reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login