<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Homo-Adminus Blog - Latest Comments in Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://homo-adminus.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:28:32 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/04/05/connecting-two-remote-local-networks-with-transparent-bridging/#comment-2460347</link><description>BCP - Bridge Control Protocol. Fun stuff!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ellisgl</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 12:28:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/04/05/connecting-two-remote-local-networks-with-transparent-bridging/#comment-2460346</link><description>Wow... worked perfectly for me.. Even with only one network card (eth0) on each system.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Paul</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:09:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/04/05/connecting-two-remote-local-networks-with-transparent-bridging/#comment-2460345</link><description>nice</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">youssiff</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:53:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/04/05/connecting-two-remote-local-networks-with-transparent-bridging/#comment-2460344</link><description>Ð±Ð»Ð¸Ð½!&lt;br&gt;Ð³Ð´Ðµ Ñ‚ÑƒÑ‚ ÐºÐ½Ð¾Ð¿ÐºÐ° Ñ€Ð°Ñ?Ð¿ÐµÑ‡Ð°Ñ‚Ð°Ñ‚ÑŒ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;TNX!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iceman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 10:17:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/04/05/connecting-two-remote-local-networks-with-transparent-bridging/#comment-2460343</link><description>Seems like you'd get a lot of pointless broadcast traffic back and forth this way, clogging a potentially constricted tunnel. Wouldn't it be better in most cases to route instead of bridge?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">miguel</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 20:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/04/05/connecting-two-remote-local-networks-with-transparent-bridging/#comment-2460342</link><description>Afaik, openvpn does not provide ethernet encapsulation for its tunnels. If if is true, you can't use openvpn for such configurations.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scoundrel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:07:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Прозрачное Соединение Двух Удаленных Локальных Сетей (Remote Bridging)</title><link>http://blog.kovyrin.net/2006/04/05/connecting-two-remote-local-networks-with-transparent-bridging/#comment-2460341</link><description>Would OpenVPN be suitable for this?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tim</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 06:01:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>